Home › Forums › Forum Archives › Amateur Harpists › The gestation of a harp
- This topic has 63 replies, 8 voices, and was last updated 17 years, 6 months ago by
Liam M.
-
AuthorPosts
-
January 29, 2009 at 3:02 pm #155100
Audrey Nickel
ParticipantJust to add, there’s plywood and there’s plywood.
January 29, 2009 at 7:35 pm #155101Karen Johns
ParticipantI agree with Audrey- my Voyageur has the same sandwiching of cherry in both the neck and pillar, and each piece is at least a 1/2 inch thick. The soundboard plywood is very thin layers of aircraft birch.
Karen
January 29, 2009 at 8:06 pm #155102Liam M
ParticipantIt is intriguing Karen as I have been studying the theory of the wire harps, the thicker the sound board, the longer the sustain. What appears to heppen is the soundboard absorbs the energy that maintains the sustain. I have duplicated this with my brass soundboard experiments.
January 29, 2009 at 9:40 pm #155103michael-rockowitz
ParticipantAudrey,
January 29, 2009 at 10:54 pm #155104michael-rockowitz
ParticipantAudrey,
Oops – I forgot to include the page with the picture of the plywood neck from Dreamsinger harps.
January 29, 2009 at 11:03 pm #155105Karen Johns
ParticipantLiam- Both of my current
January 29, 2009 at 11:15 pm #155106Tacye
ParticipantThe tension is governed by the vibrating length of the string, which ends where the string enters the hole in the soundboard so string rib thickness should not affect the tension.
January 30, 2009 at 1:36 am #155107Audrey Nickel
ParticipantThat’s true, Michael…I’d forgotten about his mahogany harps.
Audrey
January 30, 2009 at 6:21 am #155108michael-rockowitz
ParticipantTacye,
I find myself wondering if your assertion is correct, that the vibrating length of the string on the harp “ends where the string enters the hole in the soundboard.”January 31, 2009 at 5:36 am #155109michael-rockowitz
ParticipantHi to all-
I just got my book written by Jerry Brown, on harp construction and design.
January 31, 2009 at 1:03 pm #155110Tacye
ParticipantMichael, you are confused with lateral and transverse vibrations.
January 31, 2009 at 2:54 pm #155111michael-rockowitz
ParticipantHi Tacye,
I am no physicist, nor an engineer, and unfortunately, my grasp of physics is not at all advanced.
January 31, 2009 at 4:03 pm #155112bernhard-schmidt
ParticipantMaybe we could come to the conclusion that we
January 31, 2009 at 4:43 pm #155113Tacye
ParticipantWhat I hope you are trying to express is that the boundary conditions for the string, which are assumed by simple theory to be perfectly rigid end points, cannot be so in practice (as the soundboard is moving or there would be no sound) and therefore objects beyond the main vibrating length of the string can have an effect on the vibration.
February 1, 2009 at 1:23 am #155114michael-rockowitz
ParticipantTacye and Bernhard,
You both seem to be saying the same thing, and you both are far more expert in these matters than I am, so I am guessing that you are probably right, and I am mistaken.
-
AuthorPosts
- The forum ‘Amateur Harpists’ is closed to new topics and replies.


