harpcolumn

Salvi’s new concept soundboard

Log in to your Harp Column account to post or reply in the forums. If you don’t have an account yet, you’ll need to email us to set one up.

Home Forums Harps and Accessories Salvi’s new concept soundboard

Viewing 6 posts - 46 through 51 (of 51 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #70535
    Amy Wilson
    Participant

    I was hoping to get feedback from people who have owned them for a number of years.

    #70536

    Amy, to the best of my knowledge, the new soundboards are new enough that not many people have experience with them. I do know Alexandra has been to the Salvi factory in

    #70537
    Jerusha Amado
    Participant

    Gretchen,

    Do you (or anyone else) know how long Salvi has been using the new concept sound board?

    Jerusha

    #70538

    Jerusha,

    #70539
    niina
    Participant

    Hi Gretchen

    Regarding my previous comment about the Aurora. Salvi did make a few new ‘Prototype’ Aurora which apparently sounded wonderful (some say better than the Apollo). For some reason they seem to have abandoned this idea in favour of putting the Arianna soundboard onto the Diana, as they think the Diana needs a bit more oomph. Why they didn’t just improve both the Aurora AND the Diana, I don’t know. They said the new Aurora would have cost the same as now.

    Niina

    #437034

    I have mostly heard the Apollos. They definitely have a much bigger sound in the 3rd, 4th and 5th octaves. I have not heard one with nylon strings in the treble, but without them, the treble suffers in comparison with the mid-range and bass. Any harp I would buy new I would want to have made with a stirrup, a metal brace in the 7th octave on the center strip, which gives focus to those notes and projection to the 0 octave. My information is that the changes Salvi made were in accordance with Lyon & Healy design. They stopped using polyurethane finish, lightened the weight and planed the sounding board more. I believe they also widened the sounding board as Venus was, I think, the first to do. I do think that any new harp you order should have the glossy finish, as the extra polishing likely thins the finish so the sound is not inhibited, and the harp is formally presentable. With a matte finish, they look dusty. There is a problem on many harps now with the sound being inhibited, 5-10%, but enough to take the leading edge away that is so important. The “french polishing” is worth paying extra for. The question is, since they now use a water-based finish, will it have the same sound benefit?

Viewing 6 posts - 46 through 51 (of 51 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.