harpcolumn

"D.C. al Fine" and repeats

Log in to your Harp Column account to post or reply in the forums. If you don’t have an account yet, you’ll need to email us to set one up.

Home Forums Coffee Break "D.C. al Fine" and repeats

Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #241632
    Nancy Edwards
    Participant

    When playing a D.C. al Fine section, are any repeats in that section played, or is it just played straight through?

    #241635
    charles-nix
    Participant

    I’ve always understood that D.C. and D.S. did _not_ include the repeats. However in searching around the internet, I find there is some controversy about that for Beethoven and later. For Classical and earlier period, though, without repeats is assumed unless indicated otherwise. Musically, you’re likely looking at a recapitulation of material you’ve already played twice (at least). I’d think four times (with repeats) would often be really boring.

    But what works musically? Are the repeats with improvisation?

    The rules may be entirely different for pop songs, especially ones that originally had lyrics.

    #241638
    Nancy Edwards
    Participant

    Thank you, Charles. I agree playing with repeats again would be just long and boring, and anyone listening would be wondering when is it going to finally end?

    #241664
    wil-weten
    Participant

    Like charles-nix I always understood dat D.C and D.S did not include the repeats. There are a few exceptions, but then I expect a text like D.C or D.S followed by ‘con repetitione’ or ‘con rep.’

    #241754
    hearpe
    Participant

    I’ve always understood that D.C. and D.S. did _not_ include the repeats. However in searching around the internet, I find there is some controversy about that for Beethoven and later

    Ha. And sooooo typically internet somehow, where it seems that nothing is ever really verifiable but an ongoing argument between self-appointed “experts”

    The “information highway” is cluttered with the rocks of large egos.

    Personally. I often repeat the phrases for practice, but I know they generally are ignored on the second pass.

    #243533

    As a composer, you would not use the designation “Da Capo” if you wanted repeats to be played. Da capo comes from Minuetto da capo, which decrees (permanently) that after the trio, the minuet is played again without repeats. That is a fundamental classical form. It is not varied, or it becomes something else.

Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Recent Replies