Home › Forums › Forum Archives › Professional Harpists › Ouch! Replaced by a Synthesizer?
- This topic has 24 replies, 13 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 11 months ago by
Christian Frederick.
-
AuthorPosts
-
October 26, 2010 at 11:19 pm #149228
catherine-rogers
ParticipantThat’s even more insidious than previously mentioned.
I just found out the show my husband’s playing this week originally had a harp part (for which I would have been hired), but the rental now includes a synth. part with–you guessed it–the harp part incorporated into that. The show’s “Candide” by Bernstein.
October 27, 2010 at 1:20 pm #149229sherry-lenox
ParticipantDisgusting! The harp part is really important. I bet Bernstien didn’t write it!
October 27, 2010 at 1:21 pm #149230sherry-lenox
ParticipantOooops- meant to say, I bet Bernstein didn’t write the synth. part to replace a real harp…..
October 27, 2010 at 4:38 pm #149231jessica-wolff
ParticipantO please, Lenny, let it be so. (I always loved Lennie.)
October 27, 2010 at 4:40 pm #149232jessica-wolff
ParticipantYikes! I spelled /LEN*nee/ two different ways, and me a copy editor!
October 27, 2010 at 11:17 pm #149233Sylvia Clark
MemberThat was a very nice video.
October 28, 2010 at 12:40 am #149234tony-morosco
ParticipantWell, maybe we are all a little biased, but just remember, when a composer puts a harp part into a composition they do it for a reason. Because they feel that the harp adds something to that composition. So to think that the harp in a particular piece that includes it is the icing on the cake is a valid interpretation.
If the harp didn’t make a difference to the piece the composer or arranger wouldn’t have put it there in the first place. If
October 28, 2010 at 3:38 am #149235Saul Davis Zlatkovski
ParticipantI saw Candide with such an orchestration, and it truly “sucked.” But the production wasn’t that good, either. The best production of the ones I have seen, including the Bernstein revisions, was by far the one done by Minnesota Opera company. It had a small, but full orchestra, and was wonderfully witty. I wouldn’t go see it again, unless it was something like that production. It certainly needs the harp. Doing “A Little Night Music” without harp would be equally tragic.
October 28, 2010 at 3:55 am #149236catherine-rogers
ParticipantTrue. I played “A Little Night Music” some years ago and never had such fun! We wished it would run for months but it was a limited engagement. One of the best show harp parts ever. Sondheim is a genius.
October 29, 2010 at 11:28 pm #149237Christian Frederick
ParticipantI love this thread….
This reminds me of a time long ago before the advancement of sampled sounds. It was circa 1977, I was still in college at CSUN (Southern California) living in Glendale. I was asked to play the piano for a production of MAME at the Pasadena Civic Auditorium. It was a community project using talent from Pasadena and the Los Angeles area. Of course the budget was low, and I was asked to play both the piano and the harp part on the upright Baldwin piano…. so I did for a long weekend of performances. I remember the conductor saying “just play all the harp glissandos on the black notes!” So, that was seven years before I ever touched a harp string, but I would say it was my introduction to playing the harp.
So, replacing the harp is not a new phenomenon, but now synthesized sound has become soooooooo advanced, it’s hard not to recognize it’s potential.
-
AuthorPosts
- The forum ‘Professional Harpists’ is closed to new topics and replies.


