harpcolumn

Ouch! Replaced by a Synthesizer?

Log in to your Harp Column account to post or reply in the forums. If you don’t have an account yet, you’ll need to email us to set one up.

Home › Forums › Forum Archives › Professional Harpists › Ouch! Replaced by a Synthesizer?

Viewing 10 posts - 16 through 25 (of 25 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #149228
    catherine-rogers
    Participant

    That’s even more insidious than previously mentioned.

    I just found out the show my husband’s playing this week originally had a harp part (for which I would have been hired), but the rental now includes a synth. part with–you guessed it–the harp part incorporated into that. The show’s “Candide” by Bernstein.

    #149229
    sherry-lenox
    Participant

    Disgusting! The harp part is really important. I bet Bernstien didn’t write it!

    #149230
    sherry-lenox
    Participant

    Oooops- meant to say, I bet Bernstein didn’t write the synth. part to replace a real harp…..

    #149231
    jessica-wolff
    Participant

    O please, Lenny, let it be so. (I always loved Lennie.)

    #149232
    jessica-wolff
    Participant

    Yikes! I spelled /LEN*nee/ two different ways, and me a copy editor!

    #149233
    Sylvia Clark
    Member

    That was a very nice video.

    #149234
    tony-morosco
    Participant

    Well, maybe we are all a little biased, but just remember, when a composer puts a harp part into a composition they do it for a reason. Because they feel that the harp adds something to that composition. So to think that the harp in a particular piece that includes it is the icing on the cake is a valid interpretation.

    If the harp didn’t make a difference to the piece the composer or arranger wouldn’t have put it there in the first place. If

    #149235

    I saw Candide with such an orchestration, and it truly “sucked.” But the production wasn’t that good, either. The best production of the ones I have seen, including the Bernstein revisions, was by far the one done by Minnesota Opera company. It had a small, but full orchestra, and was wonderfully witty. I wouldn’t go see it again, unless it was something like that production. It certainly needs the harp. Doing “A Little Night Music” without harp would be equally tragic.

    #149236
    catherine-rogers
    Participant

    True. I played “A Little Night Music” some years ago and never had such fun! We wished it would run for months but it was a limited engagement. One of the best show harp parts ever. Sondheim is a genius.

    #149237
    Christian Frederick
    Participant

    I love this thread….

    This reminds me of a time long ago before the advancement of sampled sounds. It was circa 1977, I was still in college at CSUN (Southern California) living in Glendale. I was asked to play the piano for a production of MAME at the Pasadena Civic Auditorium. It was a community project using talent from Pasadena and the Los Angeles area. Of course the budget was low, and I was asked to play both the piano and the harp part on the upright Baldwin piano…. so I did for a long weekend of performances. I remember the conductor saying “just play all the harp glissandos on the black notes!” So, that was seven years before I ever touched a harp string, but I would say it was my introduction to playing the harp.

    So, replacing the harp is not a new phenomenon, but now synthesized sound has become soooooooo advanced, it’s hard not to recognize it’s potential.

Viewing 10 posts - 16 through 25 (of 25 total)
  • The forum ‘Professional Harpists’ is closed to new topics and replies.