Home › Forums › Repertoire › How's this harp part?
- This topic has 9 replies, 4 voices, and was last updated 6 years, 1 month ago by epistrophy.
-
AuthorPosts
-
March 16, 2018 at 3:02 pm #215869epistrophyParticipant
I’m writing a piece for an ensemble with a harp and I have some playability questions which I’m not sure about, so I just wondered if anyone here would be able to give me their opinion.
The first screenshot is the first option – I think his would be better, but if it’s too difficult I can use the second option (the sextuplets).
The tempo is crotchet = 85.
The harpist will be of a good standard but won’t have much time to practice the piece.
Any suggestions or opinions welcome! Thanks!
Attachments:
You must be logged in to view attached files.March 16, 2018 at 4:35 pm #215873Gretchen CoverParticipantPersonally, the second option is easier to play and the one I would prefer. Have you discussed this with the harpist who will actually play the part?
March 16, 2018 at 7:51 pm #215878paul-knokeParticipantThe second one is much better. In the first version, the harpist is having to place fingers on strings which have just been played, like the Eb and Bb in the first figure. This is going to damp out a lot of the sound, and runs a high risk of buzzes.
March 16, 2018 at 10:36 pm #215882carl-swansonParticipantThe second one is much better. But you need to change the notation. In all of those arpeggios, the left hand will play 3 notes, and the right hand will play 3. So group them that way. It’s mainly beats 1 and 2 of each measure that need to be corrected.
March 17, 2018 at 4:36 am #215886epistrophyParticipantGreat, thanks for the replies! Seems like I should go for the second option then.
Is this better?
Speaking with the harpist who’s going to play it would be ideal, but isn’t possible, unfortunately.
Attachments:
You must be logged in to view attached files.March 17, 2018 at 8:56 am #215892Gretchen CoverParticipantYes, looks more organized. BTW, thank you for including a harp part in your music and for asking real harpists for advice on the scoring.
March 17, 2018 at 10:15 am #215893carl-swansonParticipantIt’s PERFECT!!!
March 17, 2018 at 2:07 pm #215898epistrophyParticipantGreat, thanks for giving me your opinions, it’s much appreciated!
March 17, 2018 at 11:19 pm #215903carl-swansonParticipantYou must be English. A “crotchet” I think is an eighth note isn’t it? So counting eighth notes, 8 beats to the measure. It might be possible to play your first option. Here are three ways it could be fingered. 1) Each hand would play two notes, alternating back and forth through the whole measure. The left hand would play the first two notes, the right hand the next two, then left and right continuing through the whole measure, always playing just two notes at a time.
2) Play the first 3 notes of each 32nd note group with the left hand and the last note of the group with the right, OR, 3) Play the first note of each group with the left hand and the last 3 with the right. That’s probably the one that would work best and be perfectly playable. In that version, the left hand would play the first note of the first group with 4, then the first note of the next with 1, and continue like that through the measure. I would suggest you find a good harpist, have that person try the three suggestions I made, and then notate it for the one that he/she says works the best.- This reply was modified 6 years, 1 month ago by carl-swanson.
March 18, 2018 at 12:04 pm #215913epistrophyParticipantThanks a lot for those suggestions, Carl. A crotchet is actually a quarter note, so it’s twice as fast as that. So maybe it’s not so easily playable after all.
I did have in mind when I wrote it that each hand would play two notes, alternating between the two (the first option you mention). But if the sextuplet version is clearly more comfortable and idiomatic, I’m inclined to go with that version.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.