Home › Forums › Repertoire › Harp Notation Comparison 1
Tagged: notation
- This topic has 15 replies, 4 voices, and was last updated 5 years ago by
William Rinatti.
-
AuthorPosts
-
August 19, 2021 at 9:03 pm #258675
William Rinatti
ParticipantI would be interested to have opinions on which version of this one-bar figure harpists would rather read; the first or the second. Thanks!
Attachments:
You must be logged in to view attached files.August 20, 2021 at 5:11 am #258677wil-weten
ParticipantFrankly, I would suggest a third option. All notes notated in the treble staff, with the first 3 with the beam upward, the next 3 with the beam downward, than 3 notes with the beam upward. That way the harper knows you want clusters of 3 notes to be played alternatively with the right hand, the left hand and the right hand.
August 20, 2021 at 12:26 pm #258678carl-swanson
ParticipantI like wil-weten’s solution. A slightly different solution would be to start with your second version, and add down stems to the three notes to be played with the left hand. Those 3 notes would have double stems: up, to show they are part of a group of 9 notes, and down, to show they are played by the left hand.
August 20, 2021 at 2:06 pm #258679William Rinatti
ParticipantWil-weten,
Thank you very much! I’ve redone it and will post your suggestion in a subsequent post along with another one that is similar.
August 20, 2021 at 2:07 pm #258680William Rinatti
ParticipantCarl-Swanson,
Thank you very much! I’ve redone it and will post your suggestion in a subsequent post along with another one that is similar.
August 20, 2021 at 2:11 pm #258681William Rinatti
ParticipantGuys, your solutions mean so much to me. I’ve been studying harp scoring for years and still trying to get a handle on harpists’ preferences. Here are the two solutions you suggested. Let me know what you think.
Attachments:
You must be logged in to view attached files.August 20, 2021 at 3:30 pm #258684William Rinatti
ParticipantAnd I came up with a solution that splits the difference between the two suggestions I was given:
Attachments:
You must be logged in to view attached files.August 20, 2021 at 4:07 pm #258686carl-swanson
ParticipantWilliam,
I’ve had to do so much of this with my editions published by Carl Fischer Music. I frequently have to re-notate a passage or a measure to show as clearly as possible how it needs to be played. I frequently try several solutions and then use the one that instantly conveys all of the information needed.
In this particular case, all three of the solutions (from wil-weten, me, and your last solution) convey the necessary information. I do prefer mine for its simplicity and directness.
August 20, 2021 at 4:39 pm #258687William Rinatti
ParticipantThanks a lot.
Are there any links to sample pages of your music at Carl Fischer by chance?
August 20, 2021 at 4:51 pm #258688William Rinatti
ParticipantI found your page, but they don’t give sample previews. Anyway, I might get the Fauré book you edited since he was such a remarkable composer.
August 20, 2021 at 5:08 pm #258689carl-swanson
ParticipantI believe there are sample pages of each edition up on my web site. My newest edition, a transcription for solo harp of Ravel’s Mother Goose, is due to be released any day. I transcribed all 5 pieces, and the one that nearly killed me was Beauty and the Beast. But it’s gorgeous on the harp, as are the other movements.
August 20, 2021 at 5:14 pm #258690William Rinatti
ParticipantYes. Found it. Beautiful. I’ll wait for Mother Goose. I know it well from studying the orchestration.
August 20, 2021 at 5:34 pm #258691carl-swanson
ParticipantWilliam,
If you send me your email address (privately) I’ll put you on my email list, and you’ll get the notice when it’s available.
August 20, 2021 at 6:14 pm #258692William Rinatti
ParticipantI did so via your site.
August 22, 2021 at 8:11 pm #258714balfour-knight
ParticipantCarl’s is the best!
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.


