harpcolumn

Harp Notation Comparison 1

Log in to your Harp Column account to post or reply in the forums. If you don’t have an account yet, you’ll need to email us to set one up.

Home Forums Repertoire Harp Notation Comparison 1

Tagged: 

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 16 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #258675
    William Rinatti
    Participant

    I would be interested to have opinions on which version of this one-bar figure harpists would rather read; the first or the second. Thanks!

    Attachments:
    You must be logged in to view attached files.
    #258677
    wil-weten
    Participant

    Frankly, I would suggest a third option. All notes notated in the treble staff, with the first 3 with the beam upward, the next 3 with the beam downward, than 3 notes with the beam upward. That way the harper knows you want clusters of 3 notes to be played alternatively with the right hand, the left hand and the right hand.

    #258678
    carl-swanson
    Participant

    I like wil-weten’s solution. A slightly different solution would be to start with your second version, and add down stems to the three notes to be played with the left hand. Those 3 notes would have double stems: up, to show they are part of a group of 9 notes, and down, to show they are played by the left hand.

    #258679
    William Rinatti
    Participant

    Wil-weten,

    Thank you very much! I’ve redone it and will post your suggestion in a subsequent post along with another one that is similar.

    #258680
    William Rinatti
    Participant

    Carl-Swanson,

    Thank you very much! I’ve redone it and will post your suggestion in a subsequent post along with another one that is similar.

    #258681
    William Rinatti
    Participant

    Guys, your solutions mean so much to me. I’ve been studying harp scoring for years and still trying to get a handle on harpists’ preferences. Here are the two solutions you suggested. Let me know what you think.

    Attachments:
    You must be logged in to view attached files.
    #258684
    William Rinatti
    Participant

    And I came up with a solution that splits the difference between the two suggestions I was given:

    Attachments:
    You must be logged in to view attached files.
    #258686
    carl-swanson
    Participant

    William,

    I’ve had to do so much of this with my editions published by Carl Fischer Music. I frequently have to re-notate a passage or a measure to show as clearly as possible how it needs to be played. I frequently try several solutions and then use the one that instantly conveys all of the information needed.

    In this particular case, all three of the solutions (from wil-weten, me, and your last solution) convey the necessary information. I do prefer mine for its simplicity and directness.

    #258687
    William Rinatti
    Participant

    Thanks a lot.

    Are there any links to sample pages of your music at Carl Fischer by chance?

    #258688
    William Rinatti
    Participant

    I found your page, but they don’t give sample previews. Anyway, I might get the Fauré book you edited since he was such a remarkable composer.

    #258689
    carl-swanson
    Participant

    I believe there are sample pages of each edition up on my web site. My newest edition, a transcription for solo harp of Ravel’s Mother Goose, is due to be released any day. I transcribed all 5 pieces, and the one that nearly killed me was Beauty and the Beast. But it’s gorgeous on the harp, as are the other movements.

    #258690
    William Rinatti
    Participant

    Yes. Found it. Beautiful. I’ll wait for Mother Goose. I know it well from studying the orchestration.

    #258691
    carl-swanson
    Participant

    William,

    If you send me your email address (privately) I’ll put you on my email list, and you’ll get the notice when it’s available.

    #258692
    William Rinatti
    Participant

    I did so via your site.

    #258714
    balfour-knight
    Participant

    Carl’s is the best!

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 16 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.