harpcolumn

Folk harpers vs. classical harpists

Log in to your Harp Column account to post or reply in the forums. If you don’t have an account yet, you’ll need to email us to set one up.

Home Forums Forum Archives Amateur Harpists Folk harpers vs. classical harpists

Viewing 12 posts - 16 through 27 (of 27 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #161732
    Liam M
    Participant

    And would thse worms be metal or nylon/gut?

    #161733
    dawn-penland
    Participant

    I play pedal harp.

    #161734
    unknown-user
    Participant

    Depends on what you’re fishing for, Liam. LOL

    Okay, so if we call the lever harp players “harpers”, and the pedal harp players “harpists”, what should we call the ones who play both?

    #161735

    I think the point is some people don’t ever want to play pedal harp and that some people get that you can play lever as a primary instrument or that you can play both lever and pedal and be happy but most (especially teachers)

    #161736
    barbara-brundage
    Participant

    Liam, these days I play the lever harp primarily, but I am by no means a harper–I don’t do celtic at all, except when requested. Does that still make me a “harper”?

    Where would you put someone like Anne Marie O’Farrell, who plays the lever harp and does play Celtic music extremely well, but whose last album was an all Bach recording?

    Or someone like John Manno, who plays French Baroque music on a lever harp. Is he a harper, too?

    I still say that nowadays you can’t classify people by their semitone mechanism. Not anymore. A mechanism is a mechanism, not a musical fence to rope people off into categories, although there are a great many people with harps (to avoid the harpist/harper thing) who still don’t get that, regardless of which way they make their sharps and flats.

    #161737
    barbara-brundage
    Participant

    Oops, sorry, I meant Kim, not Liam.

    #161738
    unknown-user
    Participant

    Hmm…point taken.

    #161739
    unknown-user
    Participant

    Oh, a second thought popped into my head as well.

    #161740
    michael-rockowitz
    Participant

    Hi to all,

    This whole classification thing is pretty interesting.

    #161741
    Karen Johns
    Participant

    Maybe it would be better to ask what type of harp we all play and then go from there…

    Here’s another thought to ponder- is there any other classification of instrument that has this duality? The only one that comes to mind for me is a fiddler versus a violinist. Reading what I have here from this thread it makes me wonder if there is a violin forum out there and if this question posed would cause the same type of reactions.

    #161742
    Jerusha Amado
    Participant

    Audrey,

    My primary interest in music is classical, and my secondary is jazz.

    #161743
    tony-morosco
    Participant

    “Or maybe it would be better (at least for me) to spend more time at my harp than on these silly forums arguing over apples vs. oranges and trying to figure out why certain people get uptight over simple questions…”

    I wasn’t going to chime in anymore, but since I brought up the initial objection to the false duality being presented I can’t help but feel that was directed at me.

    Yes, it was a simple question. Too simple in that it presented a fallacious dichotomy that many people don’t fit into. I wasn’t attempting to

Viewing 12 posts - 16 through 27 (of 27 total)
  • The forum ‘Amateur Harpists’ is closed to new topics and replies.