harpcolumn

Fluoro Carbon strings lifespan

Log in to your Harp Column account to post or reply in the forums. If you don’t have an account yet, you’ll need to email us to set one up.

Home Forums Harps and Accessories Fluoro Carbon strings lifespan

Tagged: 

Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #407108
    harpnvermont
    Participant

    I was hoping to get some feedback from this very knowledgeable group. The FC strings on my harp are originals from when the harp was new in 2012.
    While the harp still sounds lovely to my ears I’m wondering if a fresh set of strings would make a big difference in her voice? I have begun to notice that many of the strings are getting a minor amount of “powder or dust” on the bottom of them that I just wipe off. I was wondering if this was degradation of the strings. I do keep the harp covered when not playing.
    She does stay in tune as she always has.
    Thank you in advance for any thoughts or experience you have!
    Harpe Diem!

    • This topic was modified 2 months, 1 week ago by harpnvermont.
    #407475
    charles-nix
    Participant

    No one has jumped in, so here is what I tell people. You didn’t specify what harp, so some may not apply to you

    Wires affect the sound of the entire harp, because they resonate with every other string on the harp. Many builders try to include at least 7 wire strings in the bass for this reason, if harp compass allows. Wires should be replaced every two years in regular usage. Maybe 3-4 years for casual usage. If they are not bright, or are corroded, they are long overdue. Ask a guitarist friend how much difference this makes.

    Nylon and Fluorocarbon degrade gradually so that the changes are not usually noticed. In regular usage nylon not more than 2 years, fluorocarbon not more than 4 years. Somewhat longer for casual usage.

    Gut usually breaks before it gets dead and ugly sounding, but not more than 3-4 years for regular usage.

    Regular professional usage I recommend roughly half those times.

    Fluorocarbon is for bright sound, and most of all for tuning stability, but that doesn’t mean it lasts forever. It still stretches and the polymer loses its cross-linking under the strain. It is still an expensive material, as is gut.

    Most importantly, though, is that ALL new harps should be regulated at about the 2 year and 5 year point. Rarely does it sit on a builder’s floor long enough for any soundboard to belly completely under the strain.

    Whether you can tell the difference or not, I can’t say. I’ve never restrung one over 5 years old that the customer failed to say “wow! I didn’t think it would make that much difference.”

    12 years without a restring or a regulation is a looong time. Longer for some harps/builders than for others.

    It is also important that the strings be put on correctly: non-slipping knots tied, wound on the pin the correct way, with the correct width of wraps giving correct string angle, and allowing for bridge pin height, tuning pin protrusion, regulation/buzzes in the lever assembly, etc.

    Charles Nix

    #407621
    carl-swanson
    Participant

    Charles- Do you know if anyone has done any tests to see what the tension is on these carbon strings, as compared to gut and nylon? I would love to see a table where nylon, gut, and carbon strings have been tested to see exactly what the tension is for each one on any particular string. Nylons have the lightest tension, and gut has more tension. But how much more? And how “light” for nylons? And do carbon strings have significantly more tension than gut strings? If they do, then this could cause structural problems over the long term for the neck and soundboard.

Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.